Politics Indiana
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Teachers, Commissioners Take Aim 12 Educators, 4 County Commissioners Challenging House, Senate Incumbents
V19, N26 Thursday March 13, 2014 Teachers, commissioners take aim 12 educators, 4 county commissioners challenging House, Senate incumbents By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – The teachers are challenging in the House. The county com- missioners are doing the same in the Senate. Looking for trends heading into the November general election, 12 teach- ers, principals Democrat teacher Mela- and school board nie Wright (left) is in a members are seek- ing Democratic rematch with State Rep. nominations in the Jack Lutz) House, with re- In two other seats, HD21 where State Rep. matches coming in four districts: Timothy Wesco is facing Democrat Jodi Buoscio and in HD16 where Rensselaer School HD29 where State Rep. Kathy Kreag Richardson is facing Board member Richard Ludington is challenging State Rep. Joe Marcum, the Republicans ran unopposed in 2012. In Douglas Gutwein; HD35 where Melanie Wright came very HD28, State Rep. Jeffrey Thompson had no Democratic close to upsetting State Rep. Jack Lutz; in HD46 where opponent in 2012, easily defeated a Libertarian candidate James Mann will face State Rep. Bob Heaton, and in HD62 by more than 18,000 votes, and will face Sean Shanley where Democrat Jeff Sparks narrowly lost to State Rep. Matt Ubelhor. Continued on page 4 The sine die primer By MATTHEW BUTLER INDIANAPOLIS – Legislators who are Indiana and Purdue basketball fans will be too busy Thursday after- noon to watch their respective games only blocks away at the Big Ten Basketball Tournament. Instead, they are trying to meet the self-imposed “It’s completely optional for the deadline of 5 p.m. -
2012 Political Contributions
2012 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS 2012 Lilly Political Contributions 2 Public Policy As a biopharmaceutical company that treats serious diseases, Lilly plays an important role in public health and its related policy debates. It is important that our company shapes global public policy debates on issues specific to the people we serve and to our other key stakeholders including shareholders and employees. Our engagement in the political arena helps address the most pressing issues related to ensuring that patients have access to needed medications—leading to improved patient outcomes. Through public policy engagement, we provide a way for all of our locations globally to shape the public policy environment in a manner that supports access to innovative medicines. We engage on issues specific to local business environments (corporate tax, for example). Based on our company’s strategy and the most recent trends in the policy environment, our company has decided to focus on three key areas: innovation, health care delivery, and pricing and reimbursement. More detailed information on key issues can be found in our 2011/12 Corporate Responsibility update: http://www.lilly.com/Documents/Lilly_2011_2012_CRupdate.pdf Through our policy research, development, and stakeholder dialogue activities, Lilly develops positions and advocates on these key issues. U.S. Political Engagement Government actions such as price controls, pharmaceutical manufacturer rebates, and access to Lilly medicines affect our ability to invest in innovation. Lilly has a comprehensive government relations operation to have a voice in the public policymaking process at the federal, state, and local levels. Lilly is committed to participating in the political process as a responsible corporate citizen to help inform the U.S. -
Voter Guide Vo
CONGRESSIONAL AND STATE LEGISLATIVE RACES CONTINUED... 1. S-Limiting Gov 2. S-CH Freedom 3. S-Churches 4. S-Prot Girls 5. S-Pro-Life 6. S-Priv & Home 7. S-Parents TOTAL 1. S-Limiting Gov 2. S-CH Freedom 3. S-Churches 4. S-Prot Girls 5. S-Pro-Life 6. S-Priv & Home 7. S-Parents TOTAL 1. S-Limiting Gov 2. S-CH Freedom 3. S-Churches 4. S-Prot Girls 5. S-Pro-Life 6. S-Priv & Home 7. S-Parents TOTAL MARSHALL NEWTON PORTER US CONGRESS US CONGRESS US CONGRESS 1. S-Limiting Gov 2. S-CH Freedom 3. S-Churches 4. S-Prot Girls 5. S-Pro-Life 6. S-Priv & Home 7. S-Parents TOTAL 1. S-Limiting Gov 2. S-CH Freedom 3. S-Churches 4. S-Prot Girls 5. S-Pro-Life 6. S-Priv & Home 7. S-Parents TOTAL DISTRICT 2 DISTRICT 4 DISTRICT 1 1. S-Limiting Gov 2. S-CH Freedom 3. S-Churches 4. S-Prot Girls 5. S-Pro-Life 6. S-Priv & Home 7. S-Parents TOTAL Patricia (Pat) Hackett 0 Jim Baird 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 Mark Leyva 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 SAINT JOSEPH SULLIVAN WABASH Jackie Walorski 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 Joe Mackey 0 Frank Mrvan Jr. 0 US CONGRESS US CONGRESS US CONGRESS STATE SENATE STATE REPRESENTATIVE STATE SENATE DISTRICT 2 DISTRICT 8 DISTRICT 2 Advance America Patricia (Pat) Hackett 0 Patricia (Pat) Hackett 0 Larry D. Bucshon 0 ERIC I. -
Candidate List - Abbreviated ALL COUNTIES 2018 GENERAL ELECTION - 11/6/2018 11:59:00 PM
Candidate List - Abbreviated ALL COUNTIES 2018 GENERAL ELECTION - 11/6/2018 11:59:00 PM OFFICE CATEGORY: US SENATOR BALLOT NAME PARTY OFFICE TITLE FILED DATE Joe Donnelly Democratic United States Senator from Indiana 2/1/2018 Lucy M. Brenton Libertarian United States Senator from Indiana 5/10/2018 Mike Braun Republican United States Senator from Indiana 1/31/2018 Nathan Altman Write-In (Independent) United States Senator from Indiana 6/27/2018 Christopher Fischer Write-In (Independent) United States Senator from Indiana 7/2/2018 James L. Johnson Jr. Write-In (Other) United States Senator from Indiana 1/11/2018 OFFICE CATEGORY: SECRETARY OF STATE BALLOT NAME PARTY OFFICE TITLE FILED DATE Jim Harper Democratic Secretary of State 6/18/2018 Mark W. Rutherford Libertarian Secretary of State 5/14/2018 Connie Lawson Republican Secretary of State 6/13/2018 George William Wolfe Write-In (Green) Secretary of State 6/26/2018 Jeremy Heath Write-In (Pirate Party) Secretary of State 6/27/2018 OFFICE CATEGORY: AUDITOR OF STATE BALLOT NAME PARTY OFFICE TITLE FILED DATE Joselyn Whitticker Democratic Auditor of State 6/26/2018 John Schick Libertarian Auditor of State 5/10/2018 Tera Klutz Republican Auditor of State 6/13/2018 OFFICE CATEGORY: TREASURER OF STATE BALLOT NAME PARTY OFFICE TITLE FILED DATE John C. Aguilera Democratic Treasurer of State 6/25/2018 Kelly Mitchell Republican Treasurer of State 6/13/2018 OFFICE CATEGORY: US REPRESENTATIVE BALLOT NAME PARTY OFFICE TITLE FILED DATE Peter J. Visclosky Democratic United States Representative, First District 1/10/2018 Mark Leyva Republican United States Representative, First District 1/22/2018 Jonathan S. -
COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS for the 120Th GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE MEMBERS Agriculture and Rural Developmen
COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS for the 120th GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE MEMBERS Agriculture and CHAIR: Rep. Don Lehe (R-Brookston) Rep. Melanie Wright (RMM) (D-Yorktown) Rural Development Vice Chair: Rep. Alan Morrison (R-Terre Haute) Rep. Sheila A. Klinker (D-Lafayette) Rep. Jim Baird (R-Greencastle) Rep. Justin W. Moed (D-Indianapolis) Rep. Greg Beumer (R-Modoc) Rep. Joe Taylor (D-South Bend) Rep. Bill Friend (R-Macy) Rep. Doug Gutwein (R-Francesville) Rep. Dick Hamm (R-Richmond) Rep. Dave Heine (R-New Haven) Rep. Sally Siegrist (R-West Lafayette) Commerce, Small CHAIR: Rep. Bob Morris (R-Fort Wayne) Rep. Carey Hamilton (RMM) (D-Indianapolis) Business and Vice Chair: Rep. Doug Miller (R-Elkhart) Rep. Daniel P. Forestal (D-Indianapolis) Economic Rep. Ron Bacon (R-Chandler) Rep. Karlee D. Macer (D-Indianapolis) Development Rep. Martin Carbaugh (R-Fort Wayne) Rep. Melanie Wright (D-Yorktown) Rep. Jack Jordan (R-Bremen) Rep. Randy Lyness (R-West Harrison) Rep. Julie Olthoff (R-Crown Point) Rep. Jim Pressel (R-Rolling Prairie) Rep. Ben Smaltz (R-Auburn) Courts and Criminal CHAIR: Rep. Thomas Washburne (R- Rep. Edward O. DeLaney (RMM) (D- Code Evansville) Indianapolis) Vice Chair: Rep. Sharon Negele (R-Attica) Rep. Ryan M. Dvorak (D-South Bend) Rep. Cindy Kirchhofer (R-Beech Grove) Rep. Ryan Hatfield (D-Evansville) Rep. Kevin Mahan (R-Hartford City) Rep. Matt Pierce (D-Bloomington) Rep. Wendy McNamara (R-Evansville) Rep. Donna Schaibley (R-Carmel) Rep. Greg Steuerwald (R-Avon) Rep. John Young (R-Franklin) Rep. Cindy Ziemke (R-Batesville) Education CHAIR: Rep. Bob Behning (R-Indianapolis) Rep. Vernon G. -
2016 State Legislators 01-20-16.Xlsx
2016 Indiana State Senator Listing by Last Name District First Name Last Name Party Office Number E‐Mail 22 Ron Alting R 317‐232‐9517 s22@iga.in.gov 8 Jim Arnold D 317‐232‐9532 s8@iga.in.gov 17 Jim Banks R 317‐232‐9457 s17@iga.in.gov 39 Eric Bassler R 317‐234‐9443 s39@iga.in.gov 50 Vaneta Becker R 317‐232‐9494 s50@iga.in.gov 23 Phil Boots R 317‐234‐9054 s23@iga.in.gov 37 Rodric Bray R 317‐234‐9426 s37@iga.in.gov 34 Jean Breaux D 317‐232‐9534 s34@iga.in.gov 10 John Broden D 317‐232‐9849 s10@iga.in.gov 15 Liz Brown R 317‐232‐9807 s15@iga.in.gov 21 Jim Buck R 317‐232‐9466 s21@iga.in.gov 5 Ed Charbonneau R 317‐232‐9494 s5@iga.in.gov 28 Michael Crider R 317‐234‐9054 s28@iga.in.gov 29 Mike Delph R 317‐232‐9541 s29@iga.in.gov 26 Doug Eckerty R 317‐234‐9466 s26@iga.in.gov 38 Jon Ford R 317‐234‐9443 s38@iga.in.gov 13 Susan Glick R 317‐232‐9493 s13@iga.in.gov 46 Ron Grooms R 317‐234‐9425 s46@iga.in.gov 18 Randy Head R 317‐232‐9488 s18@iga.in.gov 7 Brandt Hershman R 317‐232‐9840 s7@iga.in.gov 19 Travis Holdman R 317‐232‐9807 s19@iga.in.gov 47 Erin Houchin R 317‐232‐9814 s47@iga.in.gov 20 Luke Kenley R 317‐232‐9453 s20@iga.in.gov 14 Dennis Kruse R 317‐233‐0930 s14@iga.in.gov 25 Tim Lanane D 317‐232‐9427 s25@iga.in.gov 42 Jean Leising R 317‐234‐9493 s42@iga.in.gov 16 David Long R 317‐232‐9416 s16@iga.in.gov 31 James Merritt Jr. -
Indiana State Senate
A report to supporters and members of Indiana Business for Responsive Government (IBRG), the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, and allied organizations. This report will be updated as additional election results are received in the hours and days following. Another Election for the Record Books in Indiana Indiana Business for Responsive Government (IBRG), the non-partisan political action program of the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, scored a very successful general election. 48 of 49 IBRG- endorsed candidates facing opposition were victorious, including Republicans and Democrats. Forty-three (43) additional endorsed candidates did not face general election challenges. Twelve (12) new legislators won with IBRG-endorsements. IBRG was significantly-engaged in support of six (6) top-target challenger and open-seat races, as well as successfully defending twelve (12) pro-economy incumbents seriously challenged with defeat. In one of the most dramatic turn of events in years, Republicans won significant battles for state legislative seats across the state to expand their “quorum-proof majorities.” These victories were particularly surprising to those working for months closely in campaigns and candidates, as Indiana’s public opinion environment on issues and views of incumbents was - right up until Election Day - about as bad an environment for Republicans and incumbents as seen in years. This marks the third election cycle in a row that Republicans have expanded their margins in the Indiana House and Senate. The Republicans won a net two (2) seat gain in the Indiana House of Representatives to achieve a 71-29 margin. Four (4) incumbent legislators lost reelection bids in the House (one Republican and three Democrats). -
State of the Statehouse
hile elections sometime deliver results that are unexpected (the list is a long one; I’m sure you have your favorite upsets), there are also certain givens leading up to each voting responsibility. Two at the top of the list are: 1. Politicians, or maybe more accurately the people involved in the Wpolitical process, will repeatedly tell us why any election is important. That refrain is amplified in 2010, mostly because it determines who holds the mighty gavel – and pen – the following year. 2. A sea of change is coming, with the party out of power using that mantra to help regain control. The adage applies this time around, but it’s a different type of change than what was experienced two years ago or during the memorable mid-term election of 1994. The Indiana Chamber’s nonpartisan political action committee, Indiana Business for Responsive Government (IBRG), has a focused mission: help elect thoughtful candidates to the Indiana General Assembly who support pro-economy, pro-jobs legislation and initiatives. Jeff Brantley, with 20 years of experience in Indiana in a variety of roles, leads that effort as vice president of political affairs. Kevin Brinegar, Chamber president, has been with this organization for 18 years and involved in the legislative/political process for 30 years. Brinegar uses two key words – power and authority – in addressing topic No. 1. The 2010 election, of course, coincides with the 2010 census. Following the annual people count, the political party that controls the House and Senate in Indiana (and many other states), has the “power and authority to redraw district boundaries. -
2019 State Legislators.Xlsx
2019 Indiana State Senator Listing by Last Name (Updated on 1/7/19) District First Name Last Name Party Office Number** E‐Mail 22 Ron Alting R 317‐232‐9541 Senator.Alting@iga.in.gov 39 Eric Bassler R 317‐232‐9453 Senator.Bassler@iga.in.gov 50 Vaneta Becker R 317‐232‐9494 Senator.Becker@iga.in.gov 8 Mike Bohaceck R 317‐232‐9541 Senator.Bohacek@iga.in.gov 23 Phil Boots R 317‐234‐9054 Senator.Boots@iga.in.gov 37 Rodric Bray R 317‐232‐9416 Senator.Bray@iga.in.gov 34 Jean Breaux D 317‐232‐9534 s34@iga.in.gov 15 Liz Brown R 317‐232‐9426 Senator.Brown@iga.in.gov 7 Brian Buchanan R 317‐234‐9426 Senator.Buchanan@iga.in.gov 21 Jim Buck R 317‐232‐9466 Senator.Buck@iga.in.gov 16 Justin Busch R 317‐232‐9466 Senator.Busch@iga.in.gov 5 Ed Charbonneau R 317‐232‐9494 Senator.Charbonneau@iga.in.gov 24 John Crane R 317‐232‐9984 Senator.Crane@iga.in.gov 28 Michael Crider R 317‐234‐9054 Senator.Crider@iga.in.gov 12 Blake Doriot R 317‐232‐9808 Senator.Doriot@iga.in.gov 29 J.D. Ford D 317‐232‐9491 s29@iga.in.gov 38 Jon Ford R 317‐232‐9517 Senator.Ford@iga.in.gov 32 Aaron Freeman R 317‐232‐9490 Senator.Freeman@iga.in.gov 45 Chris Garten R 317‐232‐9490 Senator.Garten@iga.in.gov 26 Mike Gaskill R 317‐234‐9443 Senator.Gaskill@iga.in.gov 13 Susan Glick R 317‐232‐9493 Senator.Glick@iga.in.gov 46 Ron Grooms R 317‐234‐9425 Senator.Grooms@iga.in.gov 18 Randy Head R 317‐232‐9488 Senator.Head@iga.in.gov 19 Travis Holdman R 317‐232‐9453 Senator.Holdman@iga.in.gov 47 Erin Houchin R 317‐232‐9488 Senator.Houchin@iga.in.gov 44 Eric Koch R 317‐234‐9425 Senator.Koch@iga.in.gov 14 Dennis Kruse R 317‐233‐0930 Senator.Kruse@iga.in.gov 25 Tim Lanane D 317‐232‐9427 s25@iga.in.gov 42 Jean Leising R 317‐232‐9493 Senator.Leising@iga.in.gov 3 Eddie Melton D 317‐232‐9491 s3@iga.in.gov 31 James Merritt Jr. -
**** This Is an EXTERNAL Email. Exercise Caution. DO NOT Open Attachments Or Click Links from Unknown Senders Or Unexpected Email
Scott.A.Milkey From: Hudson, MK <mk.hudson@courts.IN.gov> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 3:23 PM To: Powell, David N;Landis, Larry (llandis@ );candacebacker@ ;Miller, Daniel R;Cozad, Sara;McCaffrey, Steve;Moore, Kevin B;andrew@sagamoreinstitute.org;Mason, Derrick;Creason, Steve;Light, Matt (matt.light@atg.in.gov);Steuerwald, Greg;Trent Glass;Brady, Linda;Murtaugh, David;Seigel, Jane;Lanham, Julie (COA);Lemmon, Bruce;Spitzer, Mark;Cunningham, Chris;McCoy, Cindy;diekhofm@bloomington.in.gov;Weber, Jennifer;Bauer, Jenny;Goodman, Michelle;Bergacs, Jamie;Hensley, Angie;Long, Chad;Haver, Diane;Thompson, Lisa;Williams, Dave;Chad Lewis;dbottorff@indianacounties.org;Andrew Cullen;David, Steven;Knox, Sandy;Luce, Steve;Karns, Allison;Hill, John (GOV);Mimi Carter;Smith, Connie S;Hensley, Angie;Mains, Diane;Dolan, Kathryn Subject: Indiana EBDM - June 22, 2016 Meeting Agenda Attachments: June 22, 2016 Agenda.docx; Indiana Collaborates to Improve Its Justice System.docx **** This is an EXTERNAL email. Exercise caution. DO NOT open attachments or click links from unknown senders or unexpected email. **** Dear Indiana EBDM team members – A reminder that the Indiana EBDM Policy Team is scheduled to meet this Wednesday, June 22 from 9:00 am – 4:00 pm at IJC. At your earliest convenience, please let me know if you plan to attend the meeting. Attached is the meeting agenda. Please note that we have a full agenda as this is the team’s final Phase V meeting. We have much to discuss as we prepare the state’s application for Phase VI. We will serve box lunches at about noon so we can make the most of our time together. -
2013 Report of Political Financial Support
2 As a biopharmaceutical company that treats serious diseases, Lilly plays an important role in public health and its related policy debates. It is important that our company shapes global public policy debates on issues specific to the people we serve and to our other key stakeholders including shareholders and employees. Our engagement in the political arena helps address the most pressing issues related to ensuring that patients have access to needed medications—leading to improved patient outcomes. Through public policy engagement, we provide a way for all of our locations globally to shape the public policy environment in a manner that supports access to innovative medicines. We engage on issues specific to local business environments (corporate tax, for example). Based on our company’s strategy and the most recent trends in the policy environment, our company has decided to focus on three key areas: innovation, health care delivery, and pricing and reimbursement. More detailed information on key issues can be found in our 2012/13 Corporate Responsibility update. Through our policy research, development, and stakeholder dialogue activities, Lilly develops positions and advocates on these key issues. Government actions such as price controls, pharmaceutical manufacturer rebates, and access to Lilly medicines affect our ability to invest in innovation. Lilly has a comprehensive government relations operation to have a voice in the public policymaking process at the federal, state and local levels. Lilly is committed to participating in the political process as a responsible corporate citizen to help inform the U.S. debate over health care and pharmaceutical innovation. As a company that operates in a highly competitive and regulated industry, Lilly must participate in the political process to fulfill its fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders, and its overall responsibilities to its customers and its employees. -
2018 General Election Report by IBRG (Update15)
A report to supporters and members of Indiana Business for Responsive Government (IBRG), the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, and allied organizations. This report will be updated as additional election results are received in the hours and days following. Tumultuous Political Environment Nets Solid Election Wins Indiana Business for Responsive Government (IBRG), the non-partisan political action program of the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, scored a very successful general election. 70 of 74 IBRG- endorsed candidates facing opposition were victorious. Twenty-one (21) additional endorsed candidates did not face general election challenges. Considerable excitement and upheaval in the Indiana electorate this mid-term election certainly created rough waves and realignments around the state. However, in the end there were few ultimate changes in the political status quo for both candidates and seats held by the parties. Republicans swept all statewide races by significant margins, led by an unexpectedly large double-digit margin victory by Mike Braun for the U.S. Senate seat. In the General Assembly, Republican majorities took a relatively modest hit, but not enough to lose super-majority status. In the House, three (3) incumbent GOP legislators were defeated, resulting in a net breakdown of a 67-33 GOP majority. In the Senate, the Republican super-majority was reduced by just one seat to 40-10 with the defeat of notorious Sen. Mike Delph (R-Carmel). Although the final tally changed little, the Senate battlefield was intense and involved more competitive races than seen in the last decade. It’s very hard to look at the 2018 midterms in Indiana state legislative races as a “status quo” election, even though the number of seats changing was minimal.